OALib Journal, Vol. 3, P. 1-15 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102459
The concept of the general force
vector field
Sergey G. Fedosin
PO
box 614088, Sviazeva
str. 22-79, Perm, Russia
E-mail: intelli@list.ru
A hypothesis is suggested that the fields associated with macroscopic
bodies, such as classical electromagnetic and gravitational fields,
acceleration field, pressure field, dissipation field, strong interaction field
and weak interaction field, are the manifestations of a single general field. Using
the generalized four-velocity as the four-potential of the general field, with
the help of the principle of least action it is shown that each of these seven
fields contributes linearly to the formation of the total four-force density. The
general field equations, equation of the particles’ motion in this field,
equation for the metric and the system’s energy are determined. It should be
noted that the stress-energy tensor of the general field includes not only the
stress-energy tensors of these seven fields, but also the cross terms with the
products of various field strengths. As a result, the energy and momentum of
the system with several fields can differ from the classical values, not taking
into account such cross terms in the general field energy and momentum.
Keywords: general field; generalized velocity; acceleration
field; pressure field; dissipation field.
PACS Nos.: 03.50.x,
12.10.–g.
1. Introduction
Many scientists believe that there is generality between the fields known in physics which is not
fully understood so far. So in the “Grand unified theory” in order to describe
elementary particles in unified quantum-field formalism an attempt is
made to combine strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions [1]. In the
“Theory of everything” gravitational interactions are also taken into account. However, so far there is
incompatibility between the general theory of relativity, describing
gravitation at the macroscopic level, and the quantum field theory, describing
interaction of particles at the microscopic level [2].
One of the well-known models of unification of gravitation and
electromagnetism is the Kaluza-Klein theory [3-4].
This theory uses five-dimensional spacetime and some scalar field, and the
theory’s consequences are the equations equivalent to Maxwell equations and the
equations of general theory of relativity.
Besides fundamental interactions, there are other fields that influence
directly the matter particles and transfer energy and momentum. These fields
include the acceleration field and pressure field [5], as well as the field of
energy dissipation due to viscosity [6]. Under the influence of these fields
almost uniform spatial and temporal distribution of velocities, pressure,
energy dissipation, potentials and field strengths takes place in bodies, which
arises from the wave equation of a standard form. Similarity of distribution of
physical functions indicates a single mechanism of their generation.
In connection with this, we introduce a concept of a macroscopic
general force vector field, in which we include the electromagnetic and
gravitational fields, acceleration field, pressure field, dissipation field,
strong interaction field, weak
interaction field and other vector
fields. This general field is assumed to be the main source of acting forces,
energy and momentum, as well as the basis for calculation of the system’s
metric from the standpoint of non-quantum classical field theory. Including the
macroscopic fields of strong interaction and weak interaction in the general
field is most necessary in those cases, when reactions of radioactive decay or
nuclear fusion take place in massive bodies, as it happens in stars.
2. The structure of fields
Table 1 and Table 2 show the notation for the basic functions of each
field that we use, including potentials, strengths, energy flux densities and
field tensors. The last column of Table 2 shows the notation for the functions
of the general field. In the following sections we will provide definitions of
each function of the general field, while the definitions of other fields were
provided in [5] and [6].
Table
1. Field
functions
Field |
Electromagnetic field |
Gravitational field |
Acceleration field |
Pressure field |
Field function |
||||
4-potential |
|
|
|
|
Scalar potential |
|
|
|
|
Vector potential |
|
|
|
|
Field strength |
|
|
|
|
Solenoidal vector |
|
|
|
|
Field tensor |
|
|
|
|
Stress-energy tensor |
|
|
|
|
Energy-momentum flux vector |
|
|
|
|
Table
2. Field
functions
Field |
Dissipation field |
Strong interaction
field |
Weak interaction field |
General field |
Field function |
||||
4-potential |
|
|
|
|
Scalar potential |
|
|
|
|
Vector potential |
|
|
|
|
Field strength |
|
|
|
|
Solenoidal vector |
|
|
|
|
Field tensor |
|
|
|
|
Stress-energy tensor |
|
|
|
|
Energy-momentum flux vector |
|
|
|
|
In Table 1 is the
Poynting vector, is the
Heaviside vector. The stress-energy tensor of the acceleration field describes
the energy and momentum of directed motion of the large-scale substance fluxes,
as well as the motion of bodies relative to an arbitrary reference frame or
rotation of bodies around a fixed pole. The small-scale and random motion of
the matter particles are described by the stress-energy tensor of the
dissipation field . We can assume that this tensor characterizes
the quantity and flux of internal energy in the form of heat and energy of
phase transitions that occur in the system as a result of viscosity. Because of
viscosity the directed substance fluxes are decelerated by the surrounding
stationary medium and transfer part of their energy to this medium.
The general field is characterized by three three-dimensional vectors
and one scalar function: the field strength and
the solenoidal vector are the
components of the tensor , and the scalar potential and the
vector potential are the
components of the 4-potential .
Table 3 shows what field functions and 4-currents are included in these
or those equations. It is assumed that the mass 4-current and the
charge 4-current represent
the matter properties, and the properties of fields are specified by the
corresponding 4-potential. The field equations are usually divided into two
four-dimensional equations – one of them reflects the field’s symmetry and does
not contain 4-currents, and the other includes the divergences of field tensors
and the 4-currents as the sources that generate the fields.
Table
3. Connection
between equations, field functions and 4-currents
Field equations and relations |
Field functions, 4-currents |
Field equations |
Divergences
of field tensors, 4-currents |
Motion equation |
Products of field
tensors and 4-currents or divergences of
fields’ stress-energy tensors |
Energy, Lagrangian, Hamiltonian |
4-potentials, field tensors and 4-currents |
Equation
for the metric |
The Ricci
tensor, scalar
curvature, fields’
stress-energy tensors |
Gauge of 4-potentials |
Divergences
of 4-potentials |
Continuity
equations |
Divergences
of 4-currents, field
tensors, the Ricci
tensor |
We will note that according to Table 3 the stress-energy tensors of
fields are present only in the equation for the metric and the equation of the matter
motion, but they do not allow us to calculate the system’s energy. As it was
shown in [7], the volume integral of the sum of stress-energy tensors of fields
gives the integral 4-vector of the system’s field energy-momentum
equal to zero. Therefore, the system’s energy is calculated in another way – not as an invariant of
the motion equation, but as an invariant conserved over time in the system, in
which the Lagrangian does not depend on time [8].
The gauge of 4-potentials allows us to simplify the field equations, especially it is noticeable in the flat spacetime
of the special theory of relativity. The continuity equations are obtained as a
result of applying the divergence to the field equations with the sources in
the form of 4-currents.
3. The action function and its variation
Since we are planning to replace all the fields existing in the matter
with one general field, the action function will include only the 4-potential
of the general field, the tensor of this field and the mass 4-current:
(1)
where is the Lagrange function or Lagrangian,
is the scalar
curvature,
is the cosmological constant,
is the 4-vector of mass (gravitational) current,
is the mass density in the reference frame associated
with the particle,
is the 4-velocity of a point particle, is the speed of light,
is the 4-potential of the general field,
described with the scalar potential and the vector potential of this field,
is the general field tensor,
and are assumed to be constant coefficients.
The 4-potential of the general field is calculated as the sum of
4-potentials of the seven fields and at the same time as a generalized
4-velocity:
. (2)
Here is the charge density in the reference frame associated with the
particle and we assume that the ratio of the charge density to the mass density
is constant. From (2) and the definition of it follows that the scalar and vector potentials of the general field are the sums
of the respective scalar and vector potentials of the fields under
consideration.
The general field tensor is defined as a 4-curl of the 4-potential :
. (3)
Assuming that , we
substitute (2) into (3):
(4)
In (4) the general field tensor is obtained as the sum of the seven
field tensors.
The action function with the terms similar to the terms in (1) was
varied in [5]. Using the results obtained there, we will make the appropriate
conclusions regarding the general field. For the variation of the action
function we can write the following:
,
(5)
,
,
where is the Ricci tensor,
is the metric tensor variation,
is an invariant 4-volume, expressed in terms of
the time coordinate differential , the
product of the space coordinate differentials, and the square root of the determinant of the metric tensor, taken with a negative
sign,
is the variation of
coordinates, due to which the variation of the mass 4-current takes place,
is the variation of the 4-potential of the
general field.
The stress-energy tensor of the general field is given by expression:
. (6)
We present some characteristics of the general field in Appendix A.
4. The general field equations
Substituting , and in (5) and summing up the terms with identical variations, we obtain the
corresponding equations as a consequence of the principle of least action. For
example, for the variation we can write the following:
,
or . (7)
Since the general field tensor is defined in (3) using a 4-curl, this
tensor is antisymmetric and the following relations hold for it:
or . (8)
Equation (8) is the equation of the general field without sources, and
equation (7) is the general field equation with the source in the form of mass
4-current.
If we apply the covariant derivative to (7) we obtain:
.
(9)
In the flat spacetime the Ricci tensor becomes zero, the covariant derivative becomes
the partial derivative, and the continuity equation acquires its standard form
in the special theory of relativity:
. (10)
The gauge condition of the 4-potential of the general field:
.
(11)
We will substitute (2) into (11):
. (12)
If we assume, as in [5-10], that all the fields appear and exist
independently of each other, then the gauges of 4-potentials of the fields
could also be independent of each other:
,
, , (13)
,
,
,
.
Relations (13) are completely consistent with (12), especially if we
assume that the ratio is constant. But the opposite statement is
false in general, since (13) does not follow directly from (12).
We can express (12) in terms of scalar and vector potentials, which are
part of the fields’ 4-potentials. In the flat spacetime can be used instead of , in which
case the result is significantly simplified:
(14)
The gauge of the general field (14) implies a connection between the
time derivative of the sum of the scalar potentials and the divergence of the
sum of the vector potentials of the seven fields.
5. The equation of motion
The term with variation is present
only in in (5):
.
Since , then in order to conform to the principle of
least action the equation must hold: . This can be written in more detail, if we take
into account (4):
.
(15)
The charge 4-current can be defined with the mass 4-current as follows: , and the tensor product can
be expressed in terms of the 4-acceleration with the
help of the operator of proper-time-derivative:
.
With this in mind, (15) turns into the four-dimensional equation of
motion of viscous compressible substance, which was introduced and analyzed in [6],
with addition of the density of 4-forces, arising due to strong and weak interactions:
. (16)
Another way to define the equation of motion is to equate the divergence
of the stress-energy tensor of the general field to zero, since the following
relation is valid:
.
(17)
To prove (17) we should expand the tensor with the help of definition (6),
apply the covariant derivative to the tensor products and then
use equations (7) and (8).
If we substitute from
(3) into the left side of (17), the equation of motion could be expressed in
terms of the 4-potential of the
general field:
. (18)
On the other hand, we have the relation:
.
Combining it with the previous equation, we find an equivalent
definition of (18):
.
6. The equation for the metric
After substituting , and in
(5) we can distinguish the terms containing the metric tensor variation:
.
Since , the equation for the metric is obtained by
equating the expression in brackets inside the integral to zero :
. (19)
Let's contract equation (19) by multiplying by the metric tensor, given that , , :
. (20)
In [5] we assumed the gauge of the cosmological constant
, which according to (2) corresponds to the
following expression:
. (21)
Gauge (21) means that the cosmological constant is not an arbitrary
quantity. For each substance unit the value can be
chosen so as to equal the total rest energy of all the particles of the
substance unit, including the energy of these particles in the potentials of
their own internal fields and excluding the energy of the particles’
interaction. The latter can be achieved only when all the particles are
separated and scattered at infinity.
With gauge (21), it follows from (20):
. (22)
Outside the matter in (21), then , and the scalar curvature is equal to zero: .
Let us substitute (21) and (22) into (19):
. (23)
We will obtain the same if we multiply (20) by and divide
by 4 and then substitute in (19).
The equation for the metric (23) coincides with the equivalent equation
in [5] and [6], with the difference that in (23) the stress-energy tensor of
the general field , due to its definition (6) with regard to (4),
contains not only the stress-energy tensors of the seven fields, but also
additional cross terms with the products of strengths and solenoidal vectors of
these fields.
If we apply the covariant derivative to (23), the right side becomes zero, as a consequence of the equation
of motion in the form of (17). We can apply in
the left side of (23) the equality as the property of the Einstein tensor. We will obtain the equality or the equivalent equality . If we take
into account (21-22), this leads to the following equation, which must hold
inside the matter:
.
The same expression will be obtained in case when the covariant
derivative is applied directly to (19).
7. The energy
The energy of the system, consisting of the matter and the fields, can
be calculated by the same method as in [5]. If the Lagrangian does not depend
on time, the system’s energy will be equal to the Hamiltonian of this system.
Taking into account the gauge (21-22), for the energy we obtain the following:
. (24)
The energy (24) depends on the time components of the 4-potential of the
general field and the
mass 4-current , and does not depend on the product , where the index specifies
the space components of the 4-vectors. For the 4-momentum of the system we
obtain: , where and denote the
system’s momentum and the velocity of the center of mass.
8. Conclusions
Let us compare our approach to unifying the electromagnetic and
gravitational fields, acceleration field, pressure field, dissipation field,
strong interaction field and weak interaction field with another attempt of
unifying the electromagnetic, gravitational and other arbitrary vector fields,
which was undertaken by Науменко [11]. His “Unified
theory of vector fields” (UTVF) is formulated in the framework of the special
theory of relativity. We present here a quote from [11]:
“Let us assume that
there are fields: each of which has its
corresponding charge: .
It is
suggested to consider these fields as manifestations of a single field that
conforms to the equations:
, , (25)
where
, take values from a set of symbols
() is a matrix of “elrctric
constants”,
() is a matrix of “magnetic constants”,
() is a matrix of “electrodynamical”
constants,
denotes charge
densities,
denotes current
densities.”
To these equations Науменко adds the
conditions of charge conservation for each field: . As we can see, the equations of UTVF represent extended
Maxwell equations. In these equations any field (for example, the electric or
magnetic field) can influence the divergence or curl of another field (for
example, the gravitational field, torsion field or gravitomagnetic field) or
even influence this field’s own divergence or curl.
Науменко also introduces a vector of this unified field: or , consisting of the sum of strengths and solenoidal vectors
of all the fields with the corresponding coefficients. Multiplying equations
(25) by the coefficients and
summing over the index , he obtains additional equations:
. (26)
.
(27)
In (26) the source of the unified field is the sum
of products of the fields’ charge densities and some coefficients. In (27) the
sum of the products of currents and some coefficients gives the curl and the
time derivative of the unified field strength . It turns out that the unified field’s
divergence is formed of a multitude of available charge densities, and the
currents define the curl of the unified field.
The analysis of (25-27) shows that as the basis of the unified field
equations of UTVF the idea is taken about the full symmetry of Maxwell-like
equations relative to the contribution of charges and currents in the unified
field, which is conceived as linear combination of strengths and solenoidal
vectors of a set of vector fields.
Our approach differs by the fact that as a basis the 4-potential of the
general field is taken,
consisting of the sum of 4-potentials of the seven vector fields. With the help
of , by means of antisymmetric covariant
differentiation we define the general field tensor and its
invariant . These quantities are substituted into the
Lagrangian, and the subsequent use of the principle of least action allows us
to derive the necessary equations, including the general field equations, the
equation of matter motion in the general field, the equation for calculation of
the metric, the stress-energy tensor of the general field. The source of the
general field is the mass 4-current , and the contribution of the charge 4-current in the motion equation
or in the energy is revealed when the general field tensor or the
4-potential is
multiplied by .
According to the method of construction of the 4-potential and the
general field tensor, the scalar (vector) potential of the general field
consists of the sum of the scalar (vector) potentials of the seven fields. The
same can be said about the strength and solenoidal vector of the general field
– according to (A12) they consist of the sums of the corresponding vectors of
the seven fields.
As we can see in (24), the energy of the system of matter and seven
fields in our approach appears to be dependent not only on the stress-energy
tensors of these seven fields, but also on the sum of the cross terms with the
products of different strengths and solenoidal vectors of the fields.
We remind that the Lorentz-invariant equations of the gravitational
field, coinciding by their form with Maxwell equations for the electromagnetic
field, first appeared in the works by Heaviside [12]. Subsequently, these
equations were derived in a covariant form and became the basis of the
covariant theory of gravitation [13]. Later, based on the principle of least
action the covariant equations of the acceleration field, pressure field [5]
and energy dissipation field [6] were derived. All these equations in the weak
field limit have the form of Maxwell equations. According to [7-8], the
potentials and strengths of these fields have the same dependence on the
coordinates and time, obeying the wave equation. Thus, there is every reason to
acknowledge the existence of a single general field, for which the above
mentioned seven fields are the particular forms.
In our opinion, this situation is closely connected with the theorem of
equipartition of energy. Usually this theorem is interpreted as follows: when
the system is in equilibrium, the kinetic energy is distributed between all
those degrees of freedom that appear in the energy as quadratic functions.
Apparently, this definition should be expanded so that the energy of the
general field tends to be distributed also among the degrees of freedom in the
form of strengths and solenoidal vectors of individual fields. Indeed, these
field degrees of freedom are included in the expressions for the field energy
as quadratic functions.
In turn, division of the general field into separate fields occurs
because new degrees of freedom are released by means of physical analysis,
which are characterized by their own fields. We can also say that the
4-potential of the general field can be divided to the 4-potentials of separate
fields, and therefore it consists of them. The tendency to distributing the
energy of interactions between the fields and substance is a consequence of the
energy exchange between the fields and matter particles, and the difference
between the fields arises due to different types of interaction.
As it is shown in [14], the gravitational 4-potential of an arbitrary
small particle can be presented as the product of the particle’s 4-velocity and
the gravitational potential of this particle in its rest system, divided by the
square of the speed of light. In this case, the gravitational field of a system
of moving particles can be precisely calculated taking into account the
superposition principle of potentials and field strengths of a multitude of
particles, taking into account the propagation delay of the gravitational
effect by using the method of retarded potentials and Lorentz transformations.
Although the vector potential of a single particle can be considered proportional
to the scalar potential, it is not so for a system of particles, which is the
consequence of different rules of summation of scalars and vectors. The scalar
and vector potentials of a system of particles become independent of each
other.
Exactly the same applies to the electromagnetic field of a system of
charged particles. The acceleration field, pressure field and dissipation field
were introduced by multiplying the 4-velocity of an arbitrary system’s particle
by the potential of the corresponding field at the location of the particle,
divided by the square of the speed of light [15]. This approach is suitable for
describing the strong interaction field and weak interaction field. In this
case the scalar potentials of these fields are proportional to the density of
the energy, accumulated by the matter during the reactions of strong and weak
interactions per unit mass of the matter.
This is why the 4-potential of the general field is the sum
of the 4-potentials of constituent fields and at the same time it can
characterize the interaction of all the fields with the matter. This
interaction is described by the product in the
action function (1), while denotes
the mass 4-current.
In [16], gravitation is seen as a consequence of the pressure gradient
of the quantum vacuum, which occupies the entire space within and between the
bodies. In this static picture for the emergence of gravitation gravitons are
not required.
From the classical point of view the universal character of the
equations of such fundamental fields as electromagnetic and gravitational
fields, is most naturally explained in the Fatio-Le Sage’s
theory of gravitation. This theory provides a clear physical mechanism of the
gravitational force origination [17-18], as a
consequence of the influence of ubiquitous fluxes of gravitons in the form of
tiny particles like neutrinos or photons on the bodies. This mechanism also allows
us to explain the electromagnetic interaction [13], if we assume the presence
of tiny charged particles in graviton fluxes. These graviton fluxes penetrate
all bodies and perform electromagnetic and gravitational interaction by means
of the field even between distant particles. The particles can also exert
direct mechanical action on each other, which can be represented by the
pressure field. An inevitable consequence of the action of these fields is
deceleration of fast particles in the surrounding medium, which is described by
the dissipation field. Finally, the acceleration field is introduced for
kinematical description of the motion of particles, the forces acting on them,
the energy and momentum. As a result, the general field can be represented as a
field, in which neutral and charged particles in the fluxes of neutral and
charged gravitons exchange energy and momentum with each other and with
gravitons. The energy and momentum of the general field can be associated with
the energy and momentum, acquired by the fluxes of gravitons during interaction
with the matter; and in order to take into account the system’s energy and
momentum we need to add the matter’s energy and momentum from its interaction
with gravitons.
We should add to the above-mentioned, that the strong interaction in our
opinion can be reduced to strong gravitation, acting at the level of atoms and
elementary particles [13], [19-20], with
replacement of the gravitational constant by the strong gravitational constant.
As for the weak interaction, from the standpoint of the theory of infinite
nesting of matter, it is reduced to the processes of matter transformation
under the action of fundamental fields, taking into account the action of
strong gravitation. Similarly, the pressure field and dissipation field could
be reduced to fundamental fields, if we would know all the details of interatomic and intermolecular interactions. Due to the
difficulties with such detailed information, we assume the existence of own
4-potentials in the pressure field, energy dissipation field, strong
interaction field and weak interaction field, and approximate the action of
these fields in the matter using these 4-potentials.
On the other hand, Abdus Salam, Sheldon
Glashow and Steven Weinberg have combined with one formalism
the weak and electromagnetic interactions in the quantum field theory. This
implies that such combination is also possible in the classical description of
fields and their action in massive bodies, and we make it based on the same
procedure that was used in [5-6], [15]. As for the reactions of strong and weak
interactions, we should take into account that they change the energy of
massive objects in the macroscopic gravitational and electromagnetic fields.
These reactions take place due to emission or absorption of the energy of
strong microscopic fields, acting on the atomic level, lead
to thermonuclear reactions and are the main source of stellar radiation.
The existence of additional thermonuclear energy sources inside the
stars shifts significantly the standard spatial distribution of physical
quantities. For example, the estimate of the temperature in the center of the
Sun in [7] in general corresponds to the formula of temperature decrease
proportionally to the square of the radius, as it follows from the wave
equation for the potential of the acceleration field. However, the pressure in
the center of the Sun is 58 times less than in the standard Sun model. This
deviation occurred because we did not take into account the pressure effect
from the energy and momentum acquired by the particles in nuclear reactions due
to strong and weak interactions.
If we assume that each of the seven fields under consideration is a
special manifestation of the general field, then in case of equilibrium and
steady distribution of parameters for the fields of strong and weak
interactions we can expect the field equations, similar in the form to the
equations for other fields. These equations can be obtained from (7-8) and from
equations (A1-A11) in Appendix, with replacement of the potentials and
strengths of the general field by similar quantities from Table 2 for the strong
interaction field and weak interaction field, respectively. In this case the
coefficient in (6), in
formulas (A4) and further on must be replaced by other constant coefficients to
be determined for each field. In particular, for the scalar potential of the
strong interaction field in the framework of the special theory of relativity
we expect the wave equation similar to equation (A10):
, (28)
where is a
certain coefficient.
In stationary case, the potential does not depend on time, and the solution, that follows from (28), is similar to the solution
for the pressure field in [7] for a spherical massive body:
,
(29)
where is the
scalar potential of the strong interaction field in the center of the body, is the
Lorentz factor for the particles in the center, is the
coefficient of the acceleration field.
We can express the scalar potential by a formula , where denotes
the volume energy density or the pressure, arising from reactions in the matter
including strong interaction. Nuclear reactions occur mainly in the stellar
core, on the core surface the rate of reactions is low, and at we can
assume that . Then, from (29) we can estimate in the
center of the stellar core:
.
Assuming for simplicity that the solar energy is produced mainly in
reactions involving strong interaction, equating to the
pressure in the center of the Sun equal to Pa in the standard model [21],
and substituting the core mass equal to
0.34 Solar masses and the core radius equal to
0.2 Solar radii, we obtain the estimate of the constant: m3/(kg·s2).
For comparison, in the formula for the scalar potential of the pressure field,
the same as in (29), a similar coefficient in the absence of the strong
interaction field equals m3/(kg·s2).
According to [7], for the acceleration field the corresponding coefficient also
equals , where is the
gravitational constant.
References
1. Georgi, H. and Glashow, S.L. (1974) Unity of All
Elementary Particle Forces. Physical Review Letters, 32, 438-441.
2.
Carlip,
S. (2001) Quantum Gravity: a Progress Report. Reports on Progress in Physics,
64, 885-942. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/8/301.
3.
Kaluza, T. (1921) Zum
Unitätsproblem in der Physik. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin. (Math.
Phys.): 966–972.
4. Klein, O. (1926) Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale
Relativitätstheorie. Zeitschrift
für Physik A, 37, 895-906.
5. Fedosin, S.G. (2016) About the cosmological constant, acceleration field, pressure field and
energy. Accepted by Jordan Journal of Physics. http://vixra.org/abs/1403.0023.
6. Fedosin, S.G. (2015) Four-Dimensional Equation of Motion for Viscous
Compressible and Charged Fluid with Regard to the Acceleration Field, Pressure
Field and Dissipation Field. International Journal of
Thermodynamics, 18, 13-24. doi:10.5541/ijot.5000034003.
7. Fedosin, S.G. (2014) The Integral
Energy-Momentum 4-Vector and Analysis of 4/3 Problem Based on the Pressure
Field and Acceleration Field. American Journal of Modern Physics, 3,
152-167. doi:10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.12.
8.
Fedosin,
S.G. (2015) Relativistic Energy and Mass in the Weak Field Limit. Jordan Journal of Physics, 8, 1-16.
9.
Fedosin,
S.G. (2012) The Principle of
Least Action in Covariant Theory of Gravitation.
Hadronic Journal, 35, 35-70.
10.
Fedosin,
S.G. (2012) The Hamiltonian
in Covariant Theory of Gravitation. Advances in
Natural Science, 5, 55-75. doi:10.3968%2Fj.ans.1715787020120504.2023.
11.
Науменко Ю. В. (2006) Единая теория
векторных полей (от электродинамики Максвелла к единой теории поля). Армавирское
полиграф-предприятие, Армавир. http://www.etvp.narod.ru/.
12.
Heaviside,
O. (1893) A
Gravitational and Electromagnetic Analogy, Part I. The
Electrician, 31, 281-282.
13.
Fedosin, S. (2015) The
physical theories and infinite hierarchical nesting of matter, Vol. 2. LAP
LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken.
14.
Fedosin,
S.G. (2013) 4/3 Problem for the Gravitational Field. Advances in Physics Theories and Applications, 23, 19-25.
15.
Fedosin,
S.G. (2014) The
procedure of finding the stress-energy tensor and vector field equations of any
form. Advanced Studies in Theoretical Physics, 8, 771-779.
doi:10.12988/astp.2014.47101.
16.
Caligiuri,
L.M. and Sorli A. (2014) Gravity Originates from
Variable Energy Density of Quantum Vacuum. American Journal of Modern
Physics, 3, 118-128. doi:10.11648/j.ajmp.20140303.11.
17.
Fedosin,
S.G. (2009) Model of Gravitational Interaction in the Concept of
Gravitons. Journal of Vectorial
Relativity, 4, 1-24.
18.
Michelini, M. (2007) A
flux of Micro-quanta explains Relativistic Mechanics and the Gravitational
Interaction. Apeiron
Journal, 14, 65-94.
19.
Fedosin, S. G. (1999) Fizika i filosofiia podobiia
ot preonov
do metagalaktik. Style-Mg, Perm.
20.
Fedosin, S.G.
(2012) The radius of the proton in the self-consistent
model. Hadronic Journal,
35, 349-363.
21.
Christensen-Dalsgaard et
al. (1996) The current state of solar modeling. Science, 272, 1286-1292. doi:10.1126/science.272.5266.1286.
Appendix. The characteristics of the general
field
The
antisymmetric tensor components of the general field are obtained from relation
(3). Let us introduce the following notations:
, , (A1)
where the
indices form
triplets of non-recurrent numbers of the form 1,2,3, or 3,1,2, or 2,3,1; the
3-vectors and can be
written by components: ;
.
Using these
notations the tensor can be
represented as follows:
. (A2)
The same
tensor with contravariant indices equals: . In Minkowski space the metric tensor does not
depend on the coordinates, and in this case for the general tensor field we
have the following:
. (A3)
The general
field equation (7) can be expressed in Minkowski space in terms of the vectors and using the
4-vector of mass current: , where . Substituting in (7) the covariant derivatives with the
partial derivatives , we find:
, ,
, .
(A4)
If we
multiply scalarly the second equation in (A4) by , and multiply scalarly the fourth equation by and
sum up the results, we will obtain the following:
. (A5)
Equation (A5)
contains the Poynting theorem applied to the general field, it is written in a
covariant form as the time component of equation (17):
.
If we
substitute (A2) in (17), we can obtain one scalar and one vector relation:
, . (A6)
The first
relation in (A6) is the time component of the motion equation (16) and the
second relation is the space component of (16).
The vector has the
dimension of an ordinary 3-acceleration, and the dimension of the vector is the
same as that of the frequency.
Let us
substitute the 4-potential of the general field in the
definition (A1):
, . (A7)
The vector is the
general field strength and it is expressed in terms of scalar and vector
potentials of the seven fields. The vector is the
solenoidal vector of the general field, depending on the vector potentials of
fields.
We can
substitute the tensors (A2) and (A3) in (6) and express the stress-energy
tensor of the general field in terms of the vectors and . Let us write here the expressions for the
tensor invariant and the
time components of the tensor :
, , . (A8)
The component
defines
the energy density of the general field in the given volume, and the vector defines
the energy flux density of the general field.
If we
substitute from (A7)
in the first equation in (A4), and take into account the gauge of the
4-potential (14) as follows:
, (A9)
we
will obtain the wave equation for the scalar potential:
. (A10)
From (A7),
(A9) and the second equation in (A4) the wave equation follows for the vector
potential of the general field:
. (A11)
Let us now
substitute in (A7) the general field potentials and , expressed in terms of the potentials of the
seven fields, according to (14), provided :
. (A12)
In (A12) we
used definitions of the field strengths, such as , for the
electromagnetic field, and similar definitions for other fields. According to
(A12), the strength and the
solenoidal vector of the
general field are expressed in terms of the sums of the corresponding strengths
and solenoidal vectors of the seven fields.
If we
substitute (A12) in (A2), we will obtain the relation, which coincides with (4) for the general field tensor:
.
The vectors and in (A12)
are represented as the sums of the corresponding vectors of the seven fields.
Therefore, after substituting (A12) in the general field equations (A4), these
equations could be divided into seven sets with four equations in each set,
separately for each field. As a result, we could assume that the fields and the
equations for these fields are relatively independent of each other. But in
general case, such division of the general field equations to separate
equations for each field is not always possible. Probably division of equations
and independence of fields can take place when energy and momenta distribution
between all the fields is completed in the system.
As we can see
from (A8), the stress-energy tensor of the general field includes
the vectors products of the vectors and , as well as the squares of these vectors. If we
take into account (A12), then we can see that in the tensor cross
terms appear, containing the products of strengths and solenoidal vectors of
all the seven fields. This means that the fields tend to interact with each
other, introducing additional cross terms into the energy and momentum of the
general field. This does not apply to the force action of the fields on the
matter, since there are no cross terms in the equation of motion, according to
(16) and (A6).
Source: http://sergf.ru/koen.htm