Heaviside vector is a vector of energy flux density of
gravitational field, which is a part of gravitational
stress-energy tensor in Lorentz-invariant
theory of gravitation. The Heaviside vector
can be determined by cross product of two
vectors: [1]
where is
vector of gravitational field strength
or gravitational acceleration,
is
gravitational constant,
is
gravitational torsion field or torsion
of the field,
is
the speed of light.
The Heaviside vector magnitude is equal to the amount of
gravitational energy transferred through the unit area which is normal to the
energy flux per unit time. The minus sign in the definition of means that the energy is transferred in the
direction opposite to the vector.
Contents
|
The vector quantity represents the time components of gravitational
stress-energy tensor
, with the tensor indices i = 0, k
= 1,2,3.
To determine the flux of gravitational energy through a surface, it is
necessary to integrate the vector over the area of this surface, taking into
account its motion in reference frame under consideration. Such integration
takes into account mutual orientation of vector
and normal vector of the surface, where orientation
of normal vector and the surface area depend on the speed and direction of
motion of the surface due to effects of special theory of relativity. In general
theory of relativity, additional effects arise from curvature of space-time.
From the law of conservation of energy and momentum of
matter in a gravitational field in the Lorentz-invariant theory of gravitation
should Heaviside theorem:
where is
mass current density.
According to this theorem, the gravitational energy
flowing into a certain volume in the form of energy flux density is
spent to increase the energy of field
in this volume and to carry out gravitational work as a product of field
strength
and mass current density
.
Maxwell-like
gravitational equations, in the form of which equations of
Lorentz-invariant theory of gravitation are presented, allow us to determine
the properties of plane gravitational waves from any point sources of field. In
a plane wave the vectors and
are perpendicular to each other and to direction
of wave propagation, and the relation
holds for the amplitudes.
If we assume that the wave propagates in one direction,
for the field strengths it can be written:
where and
are the angular frequency and the wave
vector.
Then for gravitational energy flux it will be:
The average value over time and space of the squared
cosine is equal to ½, so:
In practice, it should be taken into account that the
wave pattern in a gravitationally bound system of bodies is more likely to be
quadrupole than dipole in nature, since during radiation it is necessary to
take into account the contributions of all field sources, some of which move in
opposite directions.
According to the superposition principle we must first sum up at each point of
space all the existing fields and
, find them as functions of coordinates and
time, and only then calculate with the obtained total magnitudes the energy
flux in the form of the Heaviside vector.
Suppose that there is a gravitational energy flux falling on some unit
material area absorbing all the energy. Then the maximum possible gravitational pressure
is:
where is the
mean Heaviside vector and
is the amplitude of the
gravitational field strength vector of incident plane gravitational wave.
The formula for the maximum pressure can be understood
from the definition of pressure as a force ,
applied to an area
, definition of force as a change in
the field energy
along the path of the wave
over time
, provided that
:
Since the gravitational energy flux passes through bodies
with low absorption in them, to calculate the pressure it is necessary to take
the difference between the incident and outgoing energy fluxes.
Representation of gravitational energy flux first
appeared in the works by Oliver Heaviside. [2]
Previously the Umov vector for the energy flux in substance (1874) and the
Poynting vector for electromagnetic energy flux (1884) had been determined.
The
Heaviside vector is in agreement with that used by Krumm and Bedford, [3] by Fedosin, [4] by H.
Behera and P. C. Naik.[5]